[M] Why is the dgMetadataID in moles granules called dgModelID

[lawrence]

In fact throughout MOLES. Why do things with the same semantic meaning have different names? Presumably this is MOLES 1.3:

<dgDataGranule>
   <dataModelID>
        <schemeIdentifier>NDG-A0</schemeIdentifier>
        <repositoryIdentifier>badc.nerc.ac.uk</repositoryIdentifier>
        <localIdentifier>AfEj15o6</localIdentifier>
   </dataModelID>
   <dgGranuleSummary>
        <dgGranuleName>COAPEC_500YrRun_wholerun_decadal_ocean</dgGranuleName>
   </dgGranuleSummary>
</dgDataGranule>

Anyway, for future why shouldn't it be dgMetadataID in there?

[ko23]

I've remembered!

Back in the days of IDIssues.doc, it was agreed that the CSML ID would be in the same format/syntax, and so it would be the actual "Model ID", rather than a "made-up" MOLES ID, so the naming was meant to reflect the actual source.

Everything then went quiet...