Ticket #14 (closed task: fixed)

Opened 11 years ago

Last modified 11 years ago

do we need mo_activity?

Reported by: lawrence Owned by: Simon Cox
Priority: trivial Milestone: V3.2 UML Final
Component: UML Information Model Version: V3.2
Keywords: Cc:


Do we need MO_Activity? It is not used in the model at present, though we might want it for packaging reasons.

Change History

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by lawrence

Note that we may well want to include details of project funding, but if projects can consist of projects, is there a distinction?

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by sjdcox

Overlap with CRIS? see #22

comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by lawrence

  • Priority changed from major to trivial

comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by lawrence

if we don't use it, we should lose it, for the software implementers!

comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by lawrence

Actually, there's a bit more to this than met the eye!

We had it initially because we wanted to support as near as possible the old idea that
project and deployments were specialisations of activity.

I now suspect we might need to keep it, at least until we work out how numerical
activities fit into the deployment project hierarchy. See ticket:29

comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by sjdcox

We have now implemented Numerical Activity as MO_Computation.
There are no inbound links to MO_Activity so it appears to be redundant.

comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by sjdcox

  • Status changed from new to closed
  • Resolution set to fixed

'activity' is the roleName of Deployments wrt projects.
I'm going to move MO_Activity into an 'experimental' package.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
 Trac Powered
Site hosted at the
British Atmospheric Data Centre
for the